<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1' ?>
  				<rss xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/' version='2.0'>
					<channel>
						<title>The Daily Case Report, California Civil Edition</title>
						<description>Podcast recap of the latest Slip Opinions with MCLE credit</description>
						<link>http://www.dailycasereport.com/</link>
						<copyright>Copyright 2007, The Daily Case Report, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED</copyright>
						<item>
						 <title><![CDATA[Admiralty - Price v. Connolly-Pacific Co.]]></title>
						 <link>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3717/?rss</link>
						 <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3717/?rss</guid>
						 <description>
							<![CDATA[Commuter seaman who contracts a vector borne virus between the beginning and ending dates of his engagement on a ship, but not necessarily during his regular work hours on board the vessel, is not entitled...]]>
						 </description>
 						 <content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[<p>Commuter seaman who contracts a vector borne virus between the beginning and ending dates of his engagement on a ship, but not necessarily during his regular work hours on board the vessel, is not entitled to maintenance and cure from the vessel owner.<br /><br />For a short MCLE podcast of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'><u>view today's Daily Case Report</u></a></p>]]>
						 </content:encoded>
						 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/184/?rss'><![CDATA[California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 7]]></category>
					 	 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_practice_area/2/?rss'><![CDATA[Admiralty]]></category>
						 <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Daily Case Report]]></dc:creator>
						 <source url='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'>The Daily Case Report</source>
						 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
					 </item><item>
						 <title><![CDATA[Labor And Employment Law - Lawrence v. Dep't of Interior]]></title>
						 <link>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3719/?rss</link>
						 <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3719/?rss</guid>
						 <description>
							<![CDATA[Denial of increased retirement benefits payable to employees whose duties included firefighting was proper where Plaintiff, an member of an Indian Tribe and an employee of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, fai...]]>
						 </description>
 						 <content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[<p>Denial of increased retirement benefits payable to employees whose duties included firefighting was proper where Plaintiff, an member of an Indian Tribe and an employee of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, failed to file a timely application and claimed that his failure was due to the failure of the BIA to inform him of an impending deadline for retroactive reclassifications of his service to reflect firefighting service<br /><br />For a short MCLE podcast of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'><u>view today's Daily Case Report</u></a></p>]]>
						 </content:encoded>
						 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168/?rss'><![CDATA[9th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
					 	 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_practice_area/27/?rss'><![CDATA[Labor And Employment Law]]></category>
						 <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Daily Case Report]]></dc:creator>
						 <source url='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'>The Daily Case Report</source>
						 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
					 </item><item>
						 <title><![CDATA[Labor And Employment Law - Levine v. City of Alameda]]></title>
						 <link>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3715/?rss</link>
						 <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3715/?rss</guid>
						 <description>
							<![CDATA[City employee's due process rights are violated when he is laid off without being provided a hearing in which to present his side of the story, even though union contract stated that employee was not entit...]]>
						 </description>
 						 <content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[<p>City employee's due process rights are violated when he is laid off without being provided a hearing in which to present his side of the story, even though union contract stated that employee was not entitled to pretermination hearing in the event of lay offs.  But neither his supervisor, nor the city are liable in damages, the supervisor being entitled to qualified immunity, and the city having no policy amounting to deliberate indifference to the employee's constitutional rights.<br /><br />For a short MCLE podcast of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'><u>view today's Daily Case Report</u></a></p>]]>
						 </content:encoded>
						 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168/?rss'><![CDATA[9th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
					 	 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_practice_area/27/?rss'><![CDATA[Labor And Employment Law]]></category>
						 <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Daily Case Report]]></dc:creator>
						 <source url='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'>The Daily Case Report</source>
						 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
					 </item><item>
						 <title><![CDATA[Modification - Garcia v. Brockway]]></title>
						 <link>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3718/?rss</link>
						 <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3718/?rss</guid>
						 <description>
							<![CDATA[The decision in <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/2245' target='_blank'>Garcia v. Brockway</a>, filed September 20, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the en banc court ...]]>
						 </description>
 						 <content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[<p>The decision in <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/2245' target='_blank'>Garcia v. Brockway</a>, filed September 20, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the en banc court with minor amendments. <br /><br />For a short MCLE podcast of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'><u>view today's Daily Case Report</u></a></p>]]>
						 </content:encoded>
						 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168/?rss'><![CDATA[9th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
					 	 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_practice_area/30/?rss'><![CDATA[Modification]]></category>
						 <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Daily Case Report]]></dc:creator>
						 <source url='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'>The Daily Case Report</source>
						 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
					 </item><item>
						 <title><![CDATA[Land Use And Planning - North Pacifica LLC v. City of Pacifica]]></title>
						 <link>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3716/?rss</link>
						 <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3716/?rss</guid>
						 <description>
							<![CDATA[Developer's equal protection claim against city fails because city did not intentionally treat developer differently from any other developer.  Developer's due process claim against city fails because deve...]]>
						 </description>
 						 <content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[<p>Developer's equal protection claim against city fails because city did not intentionally treat developer differently from any other developer.  Developer's due process claim against city fails because developer did not allege any irrational delay in the city's approval of its permits.<br /><br />For a short MCLE podcast of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'><u>view today's Daily Case Report</u></a></p>]]>
						 </content:encoded>
						 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168/?rss'><![CDATA[9th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
					 	 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_practice_area/39/?rss'><![CDATA[Land Use And Planning]]></category>
						 <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Daily Case Report]]></dc:creator>
						 <source url='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'>The Daily Case Report</source>
						 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
					 </item><item>
						 <title><![CDATA[Criminal Law And Criminal Procedure - People v. Ross]]></title>
						 <link>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3714/?rss</link>
						 <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3714/?rss</guid>
						 <description>
							<![CDATA[...]]>
						 </description>
 						 <content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[<p><br /><br />For a short MCLE podcast of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'><u>view today's Daily Case Report</u></a></p>]]>
						 </content:encoded>
						 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/183/?rss'><![CDATA[California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 6]]></category>
					 	 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_practice_area/48/?rss'><![CDATA[Criminal Law And Criminal Procedure]]></category>
						 <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Daily Case Report]]></dc:creator>
						 <source url='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'>The Daily Case Report</source>
						 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
					 </item><item>
						 <title><![CDATA[Criminal Law And Criminal Procedure - United States v. Crandall]]></title>
						 <link>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3720/?rss</link>
						 <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3720/?rss</guid>
						 <description>
							<![CDATA[...]]>
						 </description>
 						 <content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[<p><br /><br />For a short MCLE podcast of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'><u>view today's Daily Case Report</u></a></p>]]>
						 </content:encoded>
						 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168/?rss'><![CDATA[9th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
					 	 <category domain='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_practice_area/48/?rss'><![CDATA[Criminal Law And Criminal Procedure]]></category>
						 <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Daily Case Report]]></dc:creator>
						 <source url='http://www.dailycasereport.com/?rss'>The Daily Case Report</source>
						 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
					 </item></channel>
				 </rss>