<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
				<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>
  					<title type='text'>The Daily Case Report, California civil edition</title>
  					<subtitle type='html'>
  						Podcast recap of the latest Slip Opinions - MCLE credit
  					</subtitle>
					<updated>2008-05-14T00:05:00Z</updated>
  					<id>http://www.dailycasereport.com/</id>
					<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' hreflang='en' href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/' />
					<link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/feed/feed.atom.php' />
  					<rights>Copyright (c) 2007, The Daily Case Report</rights>
					<author>
						<name>The Daily Case Report</name>
						<uri>http://www.dailycasereport.com/</uri>
					</author>
					<contributor>
						<name>The Daily Case Report</name>
						<uri>http://www.dailycasereport.com/</uri>
					</contributor>
					
				<entry>
					<title type='text'><![CDATA[Admiralty - Price v. Connolly-Pacific Co.]]></title>
					<link rel='alternate' href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3717' />
					<content type='xhtml' xml:lang='en-US' xml:base='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>
						<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
							<p>
							Commuter seaman who contracts a vector borne virus between the beginning and ending dates of his engagement on a ship, but not necessarily during his regular work hours on board the vessel, is not entitled to maintenance and cure from the vessel owner.
							<br /><br />
							For analysis of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>view today's MCLE Video Daily Case Report</a>
							</p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<category term='California Court Of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 7' scheme='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/184' label='California Court Of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 7'/>
					<id>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3717</id>
					<updated>2008-05-14T00:05:00-07:00</updated>
					<summary>
						<![CDATA[Commuter seaman who contracts a vector borne virus between the beginning and ending dates of his engagement on a ship, but not necessarily during his regular work hours on board the vessel, is not entitled to maintenance and cure from the vessel owner.]]>
					</summary>
				</entry>
				<entry>
					<title type='text'><![CDATA[Labor And Employment Law - Lawrence v. Dep't of Interior]]></title>
					<link rel='alternate' href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3719' />
					<content type='xhtml' xml:lang='en-US' xml:base='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>
						<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
							<p>
							Denial of increased retirement benefits payable to employees whose duties included firefighting was proper where Plaintiff, an member of an Indian Tribe and an employee of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, failed to file a timely application and claimed that his failure was due to the failure of the BIA to inform him of an impending deadline for retroactive reclassifications of his service to reflect firefighting service
							<br /><br />
							For analysis of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>view today's MCLE Video Daily Case Report</a>
							</p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<category term='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals' scheme='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168' label='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals'/>
					<id>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3719</id>
					<updated>2008-05-14T00:05:01-07:00</updated>
					<summary>
						<![CDATA[Denial of increased retirement benefits payable to employees whose duties included firefighting was proper where Plaintiff, an member of an Indian Tribe and an employee of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, failed to file a timely application and claimed that his failure was due to the failure of the BIA to inform him of an impending deadline for retroactive reclassifications of his service to reflect firefighting service]]>
					</summary>
				</entry>
				<entry>
					<title type='text'><![CDATA[Labor And Employment Law - Levine v. City of Alameda]]></title>
					<link rel='alternate' href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3715' />
					<content type='xhtml' xml:lang='en-US' xml:base='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>
						<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
							<p>
							City employee's due process rights are violated when he is laid off without being provided a hearing in which to present his side of the story, even though union contract stated that employee was not entitled to pretermination hearing in the event of lay offs.  But neither his supervisor, nor the city are liable in damages, the supervisor being entitled to qualified immunity, and the city having no policy amounting to deliberate indifference to the employee's constitutional rights.
							<br /><br />
							For analysis of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>view today's MCLE Video Daily Case Report</a>
							</p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<category term='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals' scheme='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168' label='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals'/>
					<id>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3715</id>
					<updated>2008-05-14T00:05:02-07:00</updated>
					<summary>
						<![CDATA[City employee's due process rights are violated when he is laid off without being provided a hearing in which to present his side of the story, even though union contract stated that employee was not entitled to pretermination hearing in the event of lay offs.  But neither his supervisor, nor the city are liable in damages, the supervisor being entitled to qualified immunity, and the city having no policy amounting to deliberate indifference to the employee's constitutional rights.]]>
					</summary>
				</entry>
				<entry>
					<title type='text'><![CDATA[Modification - Garcia v. Brockway]]></title>
					<link rel='alternate' href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3718' />
					<content type='xhtml' xml:lang='en-US' xml:base='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>
						<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
							<p>
							The decision in <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/2245' target='_blank'>Garcia v. Brockway</a>, filed September 20, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the en banc court with minor amendments. 
							<br /><br />
							For analysis of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>view today's MCLE Video Daily Case Report</a>
							</p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<category term='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals' scheme='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168' label='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals'/>
					<id>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3718</id>
					<updated>2008-05-14T00:05:03-07:00</updated>
					<summary>
						<![CDATA[The decision in <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/2245' target='_blank'>Garcia v. Brockway</a>, filed September 20, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the en banc court with minor amendments. ]]>
					</summary>
				</entry>
				<entry>
					<title type='text'><![CDATA[Land Use And Planning - North Pacifica LLC v. City of Pacifica]]></title>
					<link rel='alternate' href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3716' />
					<content type='xhtml' xml:lang='en-US' xml:base='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>
						<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
							<p>
							Developer's equal protection claim against city fails because city did not intentionally treat developer differently from any other developer.  Developer's due process claim against city fails because developer did not allege any irrational delay in the city's approval of its permits.
							<br /><br />
							For analysis of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>view today's MCLE Video Daily Case Report</a>
							</p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<category term='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals' scheme='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168' label='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals'/>
					<id>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3716</id>
					<updated>2008-05-14T00:05:04-07:00</updated>
					<summary>
						<![CDATA[Developer's equal protection claim against city fails because city did not intentionally treat developer differently from any other developer.  Developer's due process claim against city fails because developer did not allege any irrational delay in the city's approval of its permits.]]>
					</summary>
				</entry>
				<entry>
					<title type='text'><![CDATA[Criminal Law And Criminal Procedure - People v. Ross]]></title>
					<link rel='alternate' href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3714' />
					<content type='xhtml' xml:lang='en-US' xml:base='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>
						<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
							<p>
							
							<br /><br />
							For analysis of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>view today's MCLE Video Daily Case Report</a>
							</p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<category term='California Court Of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 6' scheme='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/183' label='California Court Of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 6'/>
					<id>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3714</id>
					<updated>2008-05-14T00:05:05-07:00</updated>
					<summary>
						<![CDATA[]]>
					</summary>
				</entry>
				<entry>
					<title type='text'><![CDATA[Criminal Law And Criminal Procedure - United States v. Crandall]]></title>
					<link rel='alternate' href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3720' />
					<content type='xhtml' xml:lang='en-US' xml:base='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>
						<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
							<p>
							
							<br /><br />
							For analysis of the newest Civil Slip Opinions, <a href='http://www.dailycasereport.com/'>view today's MCLE Video Daily Case Report</a>
							</p>
						</div>
					</content>
					<category term='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals' scheme='http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_court/168' label='9th Circuit Court Of Appeals'/>
					<id>http://www.dailycasereport.com/index.php?q=adv_sheet_by_case/3720</id>
					<updated>2008-05-14T00:05:06-07:00</updated>
					<summary>
						<![CDATA[]]>
					</summary>
				</entry></feed>